Now that I'm starting to get a better timeliness of things like hair removal, I'm starting to question my decision to go with sutin...
The main reason I preferred him over bank was the recovery that suppose to be a lot simpler. There was also the factor of price and waitlist, but it wasn't as much of a factor...
Another thing is that being circumcised, if I understand correctly, doesn't work as well with bank, but I did see results of sutin for circumcised patients, and they looked good
In terms of aesthetics, I seem to prefer bank, but not by much. Things like depth are not very important to me, but sensation is
So something that was harder for me to find from the wiki, how do they compare in things other than aesthetics?
- Sensation
- recovery (both time and how hard it is)
- risks for complications (even small ones)
- feel inside of the canal
- general experience during the time in Thailand (and how much time)
And for people who chose one of them, what made you choose?
all 26 comments