My first surgeon does robotic PPT revisions and this other surgeon does skin graft from cadavers for width and depth revisions. Do people have opinions strongly one way or the other on which route I should go? PPT would be 8 months off, the skin graft could be taken care of in two months. Would one produce more feeling and sensation in the canal? Would one be a harder recovery? I believe I’d still have to dilate with both so there is no advantage in terms of that. What are everyone’s thoughts?
all 8 comments