Question about zero depth SRS

7
u/[deleted]
Fri Nov 1 22:23:12 2019 UTC
(4 comments)

[deleted]

all 4 comments



6
u/TheStarshipAlaska
Sat Nov 2 12:10:50 2019 UTC
(1 child)

My surgeon says “yes”. With all the risks/issues that come with it should you go that route. You would need the tissue for canal to come from elsewhere, so that would mean colon, a graft, etc. I don’t know about aesthetics when doing it later.

I do not know if zero-depth increases your visual outcome for the vulvoplasty over the full thing. I’m going back for a labiaplasty, but this was planned from the start (two-stage surgery).

I have zero regrets on getting mine, but my recovery has not been easy, so don’t expect it to necessarily be a walk in the park either.

1
Mon Nov 4 19:49:10 2019 UTC
*
(0 children)

Peritoneal pull through is a technique modeled after what they do for cis women born without a canal. I'd assume it's theoretically possible, but finding a surgeon tomorrow would be hard. Maybe in a year or two, peritoneal tissue is still new to the scene. Edit: misspelled peritoneal

u/[deleted]
Sat Nov 2 14:53:25 2019 UTC
(3 children)

[deleted]

2
Sat Nov 2 15:04:43 2019 UTC
(2 children)

Thank you, would you mind saying who you’re having your second stage with?

3
u/snowgirl9
Sun Nov 3 05:26:44 2019 UTC
(0 children)

I had this about a month ago. I'm glad that I chose this given how hard the recovery has been in general. I feel like I have about 1.5 inches of depth, which is enough for me, plus I'm happy with the aesthetics overall. My surgeon told me that I can add depth later if I want to, but the graft has to come from somewhere.